skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Search for: All records

Creators/Authors contains: "Burke, Patrick"

Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

  1. Abstract This study compares real-time forecasts produced by the Warn-on-Forecast System (WoFS) and a hybrid ensemble and variational data assimilation and prediction system (WoF-Hybrid) for 31 events during 2021. Object-based verification is used to quantify and compare strengths and weaknesses of WoFS ensemble forecasts with 3-km horizontal grid spacing and WoF-Hybrid deterministic forecasts with 1.5-km horizontal grid spacing. The goal of such comparison is to provide evidence as to whether WoF-Hybrid has performance characteristics that complement or improve upon those of WoFS. Results indicate that both systems provide similar accuracy for timing and placement of thunderstorm objects identified using simulated reflectivity. WoF-Hybrid provides more accurate forecasts of updraft helicity tracks. Differences in forecast quality are case dependent; the largest difference in accuracy favoring WoF-Hybrid occurs in eight cases identified as “high-impact” by the quantity of National Weather Service Local Storm Reports, while WoFS performance is favored at short lead times for 10 “moderate-” and 13 “low-impact” events. WoF-Hybrid reflectivity objects are closer in size and location to observed objects. However, a higher thunderstorm overprediction bias is identified in WoF-Hybrid, particularly early in the forecast. Two severe weather events are selected for detailed investigation. In the case of 26 May, both systems had similar skill; however, for 10 December, WoF-Hybrid forecasts significantly outperformed WoFS forecasts. These results show improved performance for WoF-Hybrid over WoFS under certain regimes that warrants further investigation. To understand reasons for these differences will help incorporate higher-resolution modeling into Warn-on-Forecast systems. Significance StatementThe NOAA Warn-on-Forecast (WoF) project uses advanced data assimilation for rapidly updating numerical weather prediction systems to provide forecasts of individual thunderstorms. Forecasts show promise for enabling greater warning lead time for some storms. The flagship Warn-on-Forecast System (WoFS) is a 36-member analysis and 18-member forecast system at 3-km grid spacing. The project also produced a single member system that employs variational analysis and produces a deterministic forecast at 1.5-km grid spacing (WoF-Hybrid). This study seeks to evaluate and compare the performance of WoFS and WoF-Hybrid for 31 severe weather events that occurred during 2021. Results found that WoF-Hybrid predicts storm rotation particularly well compared to WoFS, and several other strengths and limitations of both systems are identified. This research may help us understand the complementary nature of two systems and improve our ability to provide more reliable 0–6-h forecasts in the future. 
    more » « less
    Free, publicly-accessible full text available March 1, 2026
  2. e apply a new deep learning technique to detect, classify, and deblend sources in multi-band astronomical images. We train and evaluate the performance of an artificial neural network built on the Mask R-CNN image processing framework, a general code for efficient object detection, classification, and instance segmentation. After evaluating the performance of our network against simulated ground truth images for star and galaxy classes, we find a precision of 92% at 80% recall for stars and a precision of 98% at 80% recall for galaxies in a typical field with ∼30 galaxies/arcmin2. We investigate the deblending capability of our code, and find that clean deblends are handled robustly during object masking, even for significantly blended sources. This technique, or extensions using similar network architectures, may be applied to current and future deep imaging surveys such as LSST and WFIRST. Our code, Astro R-CNN, is publicly available at https://github.com/burke86/astro_rcnn 
    more » « less
  3. Abstract Vulnerability of coastal regions to extreme events motivates an operational coupled inland‐coastal modeling strategy focusing on the coastal transition zone (CTZ), an area between the coast and upland river. To tackle this challenge, we propose a top‐down framework for investigating the contribution of different processes to the hydrodynamics of CTZs with various geometrical shapes, different physical properties, and under several forcing conditions. We further propose a novel method, called tidal vanishing point (TVP), for delineating the extent of CTZs through the upland. We demonstrate the applicability of our framework over the United States East and Gulf coasts. We categorize CTZs in the region into three classes, namely, without estuary (direct river–coast connection), triangular‐, and trapezoidal‐shaped estuary. The results show that although semidiurnal tidal constituents are dominant in most cases, diurnal tidal constituents become more prevalent in the river segment as the discharge increases. Also, decreasing the bed roughness value promotes more significant changes in the results than increasing it by the same value. Additionally, the estuary promotes tidal energy attenuation and consequently decreases the reach of tidal signals through the upland. The proposed framework is generic and extensible to any coastal region. 
    more » « less